Showing posts with label Classic. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Classic. Show all posts

Wednesday, 18 March 2015

4 Classic Training Ideas: Fact Or Fiction?

New Exercise and Fitness Review



It’s kind of hip these days for coaches and gym-goers to scoff at scholarly databases like PubMed—and really, studies altogether—as sources of fitness info. “Naw, I’ll stick to what works in the gym,” they say—as if that’s something simple that never changes! Luckily, you don’t have to have it one way or the other.


In recent years, a number of well-designed studies have taken aim at some of the most tightly held gym “laws” about nutrition, intensity, and supplementation. In nearly all cases, they didn’t disprove what you’re probably doing right now, but rather refined it, opening up new ways to build mass, get lean, and eat right, with less stress. This is science you can put to work right away!


Idea 1:


Here’s what we know: Our muscles are extremely adaptive to the stimulus we apply to them, and resistance training is our strongest activator of muscle growth. But beyond that, things can get a little confusing.


For example, many people have held that the most important stimulus for muscle growth is the load placed on the muscle. It has been posited that an intensity load greater than 60 percent of your one-rep max (1RM) is absolutely necessary to elicit increases in muscle size.1,2 Others have suggested that muscle growth is maximized when lifting weights that are between 80 and 95 percent of 1RM.3 Big weights, big eating, big muscles—it all makes sense, right?


The takeaway here isn’t “Don’t lift heavy.” It’s more like, “You don’t only need to lift heavy.”


Recent research has us questioning these rules. Several studies have shown that the use of weights as low as 30 percent of 1RM can be equally as effective at stimulating muscle growth when performed to failure.4,5,6 Burd and colleagues had men train with either 90 percent or 30 percent of 1RM. The men using 30 percent 1RM were further divided into two subgroups: one that was matched for the work performed by the 90 percent 1RM group, and another that continued repetitions to failure using 30 percent 1RM. The results showed that muscle protein synthesis increased to the same degree in the 90 and 30 percent 1RM-to-failure groups, while the 30 percent work-matched group fell short.




  1. Track and increase total pounds lifted

  2. Work to failure at least some of the time

  3. Focus on mind-muscle connection

  4. Use intensity-boosting techniques: dropsets, slow-reps, 1-1/2 reps

  5. Eat and supplement for muscle growth!


Verdict


The takeaway here isn’t “Don’t lift heavy.” It’s more like, “You don’t only need to lift heavy.” These studies uncover how low-load and high-load resistance training can produce similar anabolic responses and gains in muscle size, highlighting the importance of tracking the total work you perform—as well as lifting to failure if your goal is muscle growth.


Idea 2:


Slugging down a post-workout protein shake after a solid workout becomes second nature to most bodybuilders. This has been ingrained in us for so long, it’s become an unofficial law of the gym to use what’s been called the “window of opportunity,” or just the “anabolic window.” But, in recent years, it’s become clear that this arbitrary timeframe isn’t as crucial as we once believed.


It’s been known for years that when essential amino acids and carbohydrates are consumed three hours after exercise, as opposed to one hour after exercise, the effect on muscle protein synthesis is no different.7 Both time-points prove to be satisfactory for promoting muscle growth. However, what if the window was even larger—like a whole day?


In a long-term training study, Hoffman and colleagues investigated the effect of protein supplementation timing on body composition and strength measures.8 During a 10-week resistance training program, trained men consumed protein supplements either in the morning and evening, or immediately before and immediately after workouts. The timing of protein supplementation didn’t provide any added benefit for the measures of body composition or strength over course of the study.


Verdict


Take your shake if it’s part of your gym ritual, but don’t fool yourself into thinking it’s any more important than everything else you eat. Protein intake over the course of the day appears to be more important in eliciting in muscle growth than proximity to a workout.


Idea 3:


High-protein diets are finally becoming widely accepted as safe and effective for improving your physique—and it’s about time! But is there an upper limit for reaping the benefits?


Here’s what we know: Muscle hypertrophy occurs when muscle protein synthesis is greater than muscle protein breakdown. We also know that a high-protein meal is capable of sparking muscle protein synthesis. However, recent research has indicated that the anabolic effect reaches a plateau more quickly than many realize.


Muscle hypertrophy occurs when muscle protein synthesis is greater than muscle protein breakdown.


In a recent study, trained men weighing approximately 175 pounds drank different amounts of whey protein following a single bout of resistance exercise to investigate the ensuing anabolic effect. Muscle protein synthesis reached an upper limit with the ingestion of 20 grams of whey protein, whereas 40 grams of whey protein failed to further promote muscle protein synthesis.9


Similar parameters have been shown for other protein sources. For example, a moderate 30-gram portion of lean beef protein has shown to be equally as effective as a gut-busting 90 grams.10 Similarly, 20 grams of egg protein maximally stimulated muscle protein synthesis in men, while 40 grams of egg protein didn’t provide any further benefit.11 This refractory response is known as the “muscle full” effect.


Verdict


Because of the plateau effect on muscle protein synthesis, focusing on the amount of protein per meal is a better approach than the amount of protein per day. Save your money and maximize the muscle-building benefits of protein by eating around 0.12 grams per pound of body weight per meal, rather than cramming in high doses of protein to meet a daily standard.


Idea 4:


Prior to consuming breakfast, it’s common practice to perform aerobic exercise in an attempt to maximize fat loss. Why? Well, upon waking up from a night’s sleep, the body is in a fasted state. Glycogen and insulin levels are low, and, in theory, the body should shift energy utilization away from carbohydrates, and use more stored fat for fuel.


However, a recent study showed that fasted cardio did not provide any further benefit compared to morning cardio in a fed state.12 Over the four-week study, non-obese, college-aged females followed a hypocaloric (low-calorie) diet and performed one hour of aerobic exercise three days per week. They were provided breakfast either immediately prior to exercise, or immediately following exercise. Although short-term, the results showed no difference in fat loss when comparing those who performed cardio in a fasted or fed state.


Verdict


Some people take this study as a sign that you shouldn’t perform fasted cardio. I wouldn’t go that far. Rather, just follow personal preference, since fasted and fed cardio appear to offer similar benefits to fat loss.


However, those attempting to maintain muscle mass while losing fat should be cautious with fasted cardio. Upon waking up, our muscles are in a catabolic state, and fasted cardio can elevate the use of protein as fuel.13 These athletes should consider sipping on fast-digesting protein or BCAAs before or during morning cardio to limit muscle loss.


References

  1. McDonagh, M. J. N., & Davies, C. T. M. (1984). Adaptive response of mammalian skeletal muscle to exercise with high loads. European Journal of Applied Physiology and Occupational Physiology, 52(2), 139-155.

  2. Wernbom, M., Augustsson, J., & Thomee, R. (2007). The influence of frequency, intensity, volume and mode of strength training on whole muscle cross-sectional area in humans. Sports Medicine, 37(3), 225-264.

  3. Fry, A. C. (2004). The role of resistance exercise intensity on muscle fibre adaptations. Sports Medicine, 34(10), 663-679.

  4. Burd, N. A., West, D. W., Staples, A. W., Atherton, P. J., Baker, J. M., Moore, D. R., … & Phillips, S. M. (2010). Low-load high volume resistance exercise stimulates muscle protein synthesis more than high-load low volume resistance exercise in young men. PloS One, 5(8), e12033.

  5. Mitchell, C. J., Churchward-Venne, T. A., West, D. W., Burd, N. A., Breen, L., Baker, S. K., & Phillips, S. M. (2012). Resistance exercise load does not determine training-mediated hypertrophic gains in young men. Journal of Applied Physiology, 113(1), 71-77.

  6. Ogasawara, R., Loenneke, J. P., Thiebaud, R. S., & Abe, T. (2013). Low-load bench press training to fatigue results in muscle hypertrophy similar to high-load bench press training. International Journal of Clinical Medicine, 4(02), 114.

  7. Rasmussen, B. B., Tipton, K. D., Miller, S. L., Wolf, S. E., & Wolfe, R. R. (2000). An oral essential amino acid-carbohydrate supplement enhances muscle protein anabolism after resistance exercise. Journal of Applied Physiology, 88(2), 386-392.

  8. Hoffman, J. R., Ratamess, N. A., Tranchina, C. P., Rashti, S. L., Kang, J., & Faigenbaum, A. D. (2009). Effect of protein-supplement timing on strength, power, and body-composition changes in resistance-trained men. International Journal of Sport Nutrition, 19(2), 172.

  9. Witard, O. C., Jackman, S. R., Breen, L., Smith, K., Selby, A., & Tipton, K. D. (2014). Myofibrillar muscle protein synthesis rates subsequent to a meal in response to increasing doses of whey protein at rest and after resistance exercise. The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 99(1), 86-95.

  10. Symons, T. B., Sheffield-Moore, M., Wolfe, R. R., & Paddon-Jones, D. (2009). A moderate serving of high-quality protein maximally stimulates skeletal muscle protein synthesis in young and elderly subjects. Journal of the American Dietetic Association, 109(9), 1582-1586.

  11. Moore, D. R., Robinson, M. J., Fry, J. L., Tang, J. E., Glover, E. I., Wilkinson, S. B., … & Phillips, S. M. (2009). Ingested protein dose response of muscle and albumin protein synthesis after resistance exercise in young men. The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 89(1), 161-168.

  12. Schoenfeld, B. J., Aragon, A. A., Wilborn, C. D., Krieger, J. W., & Sonmez, G. T. (2014). Body composition changes associated with fasted versus non-fasted aerobic exercise. Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition, 11(1), 54.

  13. Lemon, P. W., & Nagle, F. J. (1980). Effects of exercise on protein and amino acid metabolism. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, 13(3), 141-149.

Recommended For You





Research Roundup Vol. 8: Breaking Insights In Training, Nutrition, And Supplementation


Every month, academic journals publish dozens of new studies about training, nutrition, and athletic performance. We read the research and zero in on the take-home lessons so you don’t have to!







Intermittent Fasting: Science And Supplementation


One of the most popular dieting concepts right now is intermittent fasting. Learn which version is right for you and how to optimize your results in the gym using the proper supplementation protocol while on an IF diet.







Measuring Your Macros: A Visual Guide!


Protein, carbs, and fat—oh my! Read on to learn more about macronutrients, how they fit into your nutrition plan, and the easiest ways to measure them.







Bodybuilding.com Articles



4 Classic Training Ideas: Fact Or Fiction?

Monday, 9 March 2015

Arnold Sports Weekend: Arnold Classic Report

New Exercise and Fitness Review


The 27th Arnold Classic saw 13 men descend upon frigid Columbus, Ohio, in an attempt to lay claim to the second most prestigious title in all of bodybuilding, trailing only the Mr. Olympia. Two of the competitors—Dexter Jackson and Branch Warren—had won this event previously; the others sought their first title and a chance to write their name into the history books, at the expense of the aforementioned legends.


While arguably the top four competitors in world—Phil Heath, Kai Greene, Dennis Wolf, and Shawn Rhoden—sat out the competition, choosing to focus on the Mr. Olympia, prejudging certainly did not lack for intrigue or controversy. The first callout comprised three men: Dexter Jackson, Branch Warren, and Justin Compton. Dexter may have been slightly softer than in previous years, but the new size he brought to the show more than made up for it. In previous years, Dexter gave up too much conditioning to add size, but this may have been his best combination of size and conditioning yet.


Branch brought his signature grainy conditioning and posing energy. He was also much tighter in the lower back than previous years, correcting a persistent Achilles heel. However, while Branch is always freaky and lean, it is tough for him to hang with the best of the best in the aesthetics department.



Dexter Jackson

Branch Warren

Justin Compton

Justin Compton was the newcomer to the group, and man, did he make a splash! He may have been the leanest guy in the show, with enormous and shredded quads, hams, and glutes. However, he had quite a bit of trouble holding in his stomach, and we know judges have placed extra emphasis on that over the years.


The Best Of The Rest


The second callout contained Roelly Winklaar, Evan Centopani, and Cedric McMillan. It was pretty clear to me that Cedric was the standout of this callout. The judges felt similarly, as they brought him back out to stand alongside the top three (Jackson, Warren, and Compton). Cedric still needs to get leaner, but his combination of size and symmetry is very difficult to overcome for competitors with lesser structure and aesthetics. Centopani, while very lean, was also very flat. He showed very little back and quad definition when compared to previous years.


I was surprised to see Roelly in the second callout, as he was not as lean as he should be for a show of this stature. He struggled to pose correctly and suck his stomach in, but his enormous arms and quads helped distract from those shortcomings.


The third callout saw Roelly and Evan remain onstage, joined by Brandon Curry and Vitaly Fateev. I was shocked to see Vitaly included in this callout. He was not in condition and lacks aesthetics, although he did have good size. Brandon Curry looked good, not great. As has been the story of the last few years, he has a pleasing physique and structure but never quite brings that crisp level of conditioning needed to rise to the next level.


For the fourth callout, Brandon and Vitaley remained onstage and were joined by Toney Freeman, Ben Pakulski, Lionel Beyeke, Marius Dohne, and Mike Kefalianos. For Freeman, Pakulski, Beyeke, and Dohne, this had to be a gut shot, as they had all won shows previously. Freeman still looks great and defies the gods of aging at 48, but the X-man’s legs were down in a bit of size from years past. Still, I had him higher than this callout.



Dexter Jackson

Branch Warren

Justin Compton

Pakulski had his trademark tightness and legs but his back and arms have a hard time hanging with many other competitors. He also looked flat with little vascularity, especially in his back. Beyeke was very soft. It’s a head scratcher: If Beyeke nailed it, he could compete for the top spot at ANY show with his structure, but he was easily the softest guy in this show. Hopefully he can come back and realize his potential. If he ever does, watch out!


Dohne looked good but unspectacular. He has made a valiant comeback from health issues, but in this field, nothing less than your absolute best will win the day. Kefalianos looked pretty good but not as tight as we’ve seen him before. With his lack of size and structure, anything less than 100-percent conditioning will leave him on the outside looking in. That was certainly the case here.


The fifth callout saw the first callout repeated, albeit with McMillan added to the group, likely solidifying the top four.


At the night show, the house was rocked by energetic routines, and the placings shook out as follows:


Sixth Place


If this guy ever gets his conditioning consistent, we will see him consistently in the top three.


Fifth Place


Unfortunately for Evan, his inability to come in at maximum fullness and hardness washes out impressive size and symmetry.


Fourth Place


Another guy who, if he figures it out, will consistently land in the top three.


Third Place


A bright future. The only thing he could have done better here is to control his stomach from protruding. He has all the tools to have a very successful career at a top level.


Second Place


Branch came in at his best in recent years, but it wasn’t enough to overcome the best version of Dexter we have seen in a while.


First Place


Dexter has completely resurrected his career and capped his amazing age-defying run with his record fifth Arnold Classic victory. He may never challenge for another Olympia, but if he can bring this combination of size and symmetry to the Olympia stage, he will give guys in the top five fits.


Congratulations to all the athletes who worked so hard and put on a phenomenal show!


2015 Arnold Main Page





Bodybuilding.com Articles



Arnold Sports Weekend: Arnold Classic Report

Friday, 27 February 2015

2015 Arnold Classic Physique International Preview

New Exercise and Fitness Review


If you follow what’s been happening in the IFBB women’s physique division, then the inaugural Women’s Physique International in Columbus, Ohio, should look familiar. Fan favorite Dana Linn Bailey will be competing again against Juliana Malacarne, who nabbed DLB’s Olympia crown last year. These talented women will likely be the last two standing once again.


The prejudging and finals will be held on the Arnold Fitness Expo stage at noon on Friday, March 6. This is a great opportunity for fans to witness eleven of the best physiques in the world without any cost outside of an expo ticket. So, if you’re at the Arnold Expo, go cheer on your favorite competitor!


Dana Linn Bailey


Dana Linn Bailey has undoubtedly become one of the most popular competitors in the entire IFBB Pro League, managing to turn her average amateur figure body into one of the best pro women’s physiques. DLB knows how to pose in order to play to her strengths and hide her weaknesses—something every smart pro should do. She doesn’t have the best symmetry, and her quads lack the detail that others in the division have, but if she brings her usual amazing package, she’ll be in the comparison for the win.



Dana Linn Bailey

LaDrissa Bonivel


LaDrissa Bonivel took the top spot at the 2011 NPC USAs and is one of the women who must lose a little mass to compete well. She’s one of the taller competitors, and, with too much muscle, just looks too big for the division. If she brings a streamlined physique similar to what she brought to the 2014 Olympia, she’ll have a chance for a top spot.



LaDrissa Bonivel

Tycie Coppett


Tycie Coppett will be one of the tallest—if not thet tallest—women on stage, so she needs to bring more muscle in order to fill out her 5-foot-9 frame. She was third at the Olympia, and I think that’s where she’ll likely finish again at the Arnold. However, I wouldn’t argue with her being in the top two. She has the balance, symmetry, and muscle to represent the division well.



Tycie Coppett

Nathalie Falk


Nathalie Falk is one of the women who downsized from her bodybuilding days to become a physique competitor. She’s coming off a 16th-place finish at the Physique Olympia, but she won the 2014 Mozolani Pro. She’ll have her work cut out for her in this field.



Nathalie Falk

Heather Grace


Heather Grace made the switch to women’s physique from the figure division. She has steadily improved her physique and moved up in the placings. She has a tremendous upper body, but will need a bit more detail and size in her legs, specifically her hamstrings, to move up into the top spots. She could crack the top six in this lineup, but it won’t be easy.



Heather Grace

Juliana Malacarne


Juliana Malacarne was a figure competitor who was told she had “too much muscle,” and never placed well because of it. When women’s physique was formed, many felt she had the ideal body for the division. She added some size in 2013, but it hurt her at the inaugural Olympia show. She went back to a sleeker physique and beat DLB for the top spot at the 2014 Olympia Showdown. If she brings that same look to the Arnold stage, she’ll likely be your winner.



Juliana Malacarne

Karina Nascimento


Karina Nascimento competed as a bodybuilder for a number of years. She even competed in the Ms. International in 2003 where she placed third. Karina took nearly a decade off from competition, but returned to win the first-ever pro women’s physique show at the 2012 Desert Muscle Classic. She always brings tremendous energy to her routines. Look for her to be in the top six.



Karina Nascimento

Mindi O’Brien


Mindi O’Brien was a fitness competitor who switched to women’s physique. She was plagued with injuries, but after some time off in 2012, she returned to make an immediate impact in the division. She’s competed in both of the Olympia physique contests, and earned first place at the 2014 Toronto Supershow. Mindi will definitely be a contender for one of the money spots.



Mindi O’Brien

Jillian Reville


Jillian Reville is another competitor who made the switch from figure. She has long, lean muscle, and has to come into her shows looking full. Jillian made a strong comeback last year and wants to improve even more. She should be in the mix for the top spots.



Jillian Reville

Jennifer Robinson


Jennifer Robinson moved to physique from figure in 2011. She was consistently in the top five in 2012, and in 2014 she took home her first pro win at the St. Louis Pro. If she comes in conditioned, she could be a threat for the top five. I’d like to see her improve her presentation, and pose a bit more slowly.



Jennifer Robinson

Sabrina Taylor


Sabrina Taylor competed in bodybuilding, fitness, and figure. But she’s found a home in the physique division, and has continued to excel in it. She has all the tools to be a top five competitor in this show, so I think she’ll land in the money.



Sabrina Taylor

My 2015 Women’s Physique International Predictions


1st: Juliana Malacarne
2nd: Dana Linn Bailey
3rd: Tycie Coppett
4th: Karina Nascimento
5th: Sabrina Taylor
6th: Jillian Reville


2015 Arnold Main Page




About The Author




I look forward to sharing my knowledge on advertising and branding with you and how it can help you in your careers.





Bodybuilding.com Articles



2015 Arnold Classic Physique International Preview

Thursday, 26 February 2015

2015 Arnold Classic Bikini International Preview

New Exercise and Fitness Review


Fifteen women will compete in the 2015 Bikini International in Columbus, Ohio. Last year’s champion, Ashley Kaltwasser, who also won the Olympia in 2013 and 2014, will attempt to become the first back-to-back champion in the popular division. She’s the lone representative from the 2014 top five, but will have her work cut out for her with a slew of up-and-coming prospects. From my seat, I see that the outcome will likely be a repeat of the Olympia.


This will be the fifth year the Bikini International competition will be held as part of the Arnold Sports Festival, and every year, the winning package gets a little sweeter. In 2015, the ladies will compete for a $ 7,000 first-prize purse. But this year, the Arnold events move from Veterans Auditorium to its new home at the Battelle Grand convention center. Who knows what excitement this new venue will bring when the prejudging and finals go down on Saturday, March 7!


Noy Alexander


Noy Alexander is no stranger to the winner’s circle, but will have her work cut out for her in this lineup. Noy took top honors at the 2014 Muscle Contest, but a top-six finish here would be a huge accomplishment. Noy is one of the few competitors who can compete in an open or masters events with ease. If she puts the nerves aside and nails her presentation, she could be in the mix.



Noy Alexander

Nicole Ankney


Nicole Ankney took top honors at the 2014 Masters Bikini and went on to win both the open and masters competitions at the Sacramento Pro. Despite her obvious talent, this year will be her first time competing at the Arnold, which is a huge step up in competition for her. Because she’s relatively new to the competition scene, a good placing in this big show will put her on the map.



Nicole Ankney

Narmin Assria


Narmin Assria will be one of the shortest competitors on stage, but don’t let her height fool you. She’s added more muscle to her upper body over the years, and looks like she wants to win. Despite being a mainstay in the top spots in all her other professional competitions, this will be her Bikini International debut. She has improved her presentation over the years. If her lower half is conditioned, she’ll be a top-six contender.



Narmin Assria

Sara Back


Sara Back’s appearance at the 2015 Arnold Sports Festival will mark the first time she competes in the United States. It will be a huge test for her. She took top honors at the 2013 IFBB Finnish Nationals, but has only competed once as a pro at last year’s Nordic Pro, where she earned third place. Sara may not be well known in the pro ranks yet, but after the Arnold, she will be. She has youthful good looks and a body that belongs in the top spots.




Bianca Berry


Bianca Berry will be competing in the Arnold for the first time, but will definitely be able to hold her own. She took some time off in 2013, but came back strong last year. She was a consistent top-five contender in 2014, so if she continues to bring the package she has been, she’ll be in the mix.



Bianca Berry

Christina Strom Fjaere


Christina Strom Fjaere dominated the amateur ranks and won her pro debut at the 2014 Mozolani Pro. Her second-ever pro show was the 2014 Bikini Olympia, which means she has tremendous potential. Christina ended the 2014 season with two top-five finishes. She has the physique and looks to make you do a double take. If she nails her conditioning, she should be in the top five.



Christina Strom Fjaere

Ashley Kaltwasser


Ashley Kaltwasser has been on a roll lately, and has become the woman with a target on her back. She’s trying to become the first woman to win this show twice, and she definitely has the physique to do it. The biggest challenge for Ashley is her presentation and the little details. She has the most athletic physique in this lineup, but her hair, makeup, and presentation have held her back in the past.



Ashley Kaltwasser

Janet Layug


Janet Layug was on the fast track of success as an amateur, and made her pro debut on the Bikini International stage last year where she finished in eighth place. From there, she went on to be a threat in every show she entered. Janet has no trouble with her presentation, and exudes confident sexiness when she’s on stage. If she brings in a tighter lower half than she did at the Olympia, I think she could land the top prize. I certainly don’t see her finishing lower than second place.



Janet Layug

Sarah LeBlanc


Sarah LeBlanc has become a leading lady in the division. She burst into the top spots last year, and won four shows. She capped off the season with a win at the Ferrigno Classic. Sarah brings her own style of posing and one of the best booties in the division. This will be her first time at the Bikini International. If you’re placing bets on where she’ll finish, you can’t go wrong with a top-six wager.



Sarah LeBlanc

Stephanie Mahoe


Stephanie Mahoe fought time and time again as an amateur to reach the coveted pro level. Once she did, she wasted no time in becoming one of the most active competitors on the circuit. She notched two wins in 2014, and will look to stay in the mix in her Bikini International debut.



Stephanie Mahoe

Justine Munro


Justine Munro arguably has the best bikini booty and physiques in the show and one of the best in the entire division. She’ll be one of the few blondes in the lineup and the lone representative from Canada. Justine was 10th at this show last year, but if she can nail the little details with her tanning, hair, and presentation, I think she’ll move up into the money spots this year.



Justine Munro

Noemi Olah


Noemi Olah won her class in the Arnold Amateur, and in 2010 won her pro debut. She’s been up and down in her placings over the years, but she has two pro wins to her credit. Noemi’s conditioning will be the determining factor on where she finishes.



Noemi Olah

India Paulino


India Paulino is the veteran competitor in this lineup. She won the show in 2013 and is hungry to get back to that top position. She was sixth in this show last year, but if she brings a similar physique to the one that earned her first place at the 2014 Tampa Pro, she’ll be back in the mix. I’m not a fan of her presentation and hip-popping, but that has never held her back from doing well in the judges’ eyes.



India Paulino

Anna Starodubtseva


Anna Starodubtseva will be competing in the Bikini International for the second time. She finished in the dreaded 16th spot last year, but don’t let the placing fool you. She earned a spot in the 2014 Bikini International contest by winning the overall Arnold Amateur Bikini in 2013. Anna was second at the 2014 Russian Pro, her best finish as a pro.



Anna Starodubtseva

Kenea Yancey


Kenea Yancey, like Anna, earned her automatic invite by winning the Arnold Amateur. Kenea won the 2014 Arnold Amateur Bikini and went on to win her class at the 2014 NPC Nationals. She wasted no time entering the pro ranks, and finished ninth in her pro debut at the Tampa Pro. From there, she improved her package and finished third the Iowa Pro.



Kenea Yancey

My 2015 Women’s Bikini International Predictions


1st Janet Layug
2nd Ashley Kaltwasser
3rd Sarah LeBlanc
4th Justine Munro
5th Christina Strom Fjaere
6th Sara Back


2015 Arnold Main Page




About The Author




I look forward to sharing my knowledge on advertising and branding with you and how it can help you in your careers.





Bodybuilding.com Articles



2015 Arnold Classic Bikini International Preview